Stockly.com Forums  

Go Back   Stockly.com Forums > Kenbak-1 Series 2 > Kenbak-1
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-18-2007, 08:29 PM
Geoff Harrison Geoff Harrison is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 104
Default

Looking at those pictures of Erik's, it seems that machine has had several mods made at some time in its history, all of them were backed out except the one involving IC99. Someone has cut (and restored) traces and connected wires to IC pins that involve states that seek instructions and update the P register, plus some others that involve the K (data lamp) register. It's all quite tantalizing.

Fortunately, unless there are some other cut traces that I missed, all those mods have been restored.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-19-2007, 03:03 AM
Cappellanus Cappellanus is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 24
Default

That modification on Eric Klein's machine is interesting because it is the first (and only?) modification known on a Kenbak-1. Common sense suggests that this should be an input or output, the only thing that a Kenbak-1 lacks to do "real work." We've probably all wondered how to make an input or output (of course, Grant's investigations show the light lines can be used, maybe with a low-pass filter.)

I seem to recall that Herbert Eisengruber (Nova Scotia) had some type of machine interfaced up to a Kenbak-1, but maybe I just dreamed this up. At one VCF meeting, in the pictures, I thought he had some later hardware that was hooked up to a kenbak-1, but now I can't find a source, and the pictures don't make that clear.

Look at this picture....
http://home.comcast.net/~msmith6020/P7160223a_copy.jpg
towards the bottom right of the picture is a photo showing a kenbak-1 with a later box on top of it. Was this a input/output interface? If anyone knows Herbert, maybe they could ask him. Herbert's machines came right out of a technical school, so I wouldn't expect them to have the modifications such as a privately owned machine could have attained.

In any case, maybe we'll never know details of why Erik's machine was modified, as a whole-big circuit board with lots of logic could have been interfaced into those few signals, and all that is long lost.

Oh, and Grant: I didn't get to the bank before they closed, so no money order. I'll definitely get it mailed by Saturday, priority mail. Don't give my kit away to anyone else!!!
Attached Images
 

Last edited by Grant Stockly; 09-10-2012 at 09:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-19-2007, 04:56 AM
Architect Architect is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 14
Default Son of John

Perhaps Eric's machine is the one that was modified by John's son. See:

http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/kenbak/...baker_1986.pdf

At page 8 (last page) he refers to three machines: the prototype, the one that is now in the Computer History Museum and one modified by his son.

Just speculating.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IC 4449 confirmation bugman Altair 680 1 06-17-2008 03:20 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.