|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "logjam" <g...@cmosxray.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics Subject: Wall of RAM Date: 1 Jan 2006 19:25:50 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 31 Message-ID: <1136172350.049224.231720@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.178.21.108 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1136172354 616 127.0.0.1 (2 Jan 2006 03:25:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 03:25:54 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.178.21.108; posting-account=aBFcgg0AAAB82nqHKVyZXRJDEB6Qpe25 A while back on ebay I was just looking around and came upon 50,000 LEDs. Ebay is a dangerous place, I can understand how women go to the store and spend $800 window shoping. $300 later and I have 50,000 LEDs in the mail Anyway, I gave away around 1,500 to friends. I still have MANY of them left. I thought a "fun" project would be to create a "Wall of RAM". Now it would be fairly easy to emulate the ram and display the results on the wall using a CPLD, but what about actually making real ram? Does anyone think its possible to use capacitors and high current drivers to use the LED+capacitor combination as ram? The goal of the project would be a wall of cards, say 4k of ram max. This wall of ram would interface to either the Altair that I bought OR the Apple 1 kit that I bought on ebay. What do you guys think? It seems that with some RAS/CAS decoding logic that it shouldn't be too hard. The cons of this project are the cost of 4,096 capacitors and PCBs. The pros of the project are, well, it would look really neat. Tell me what you think. Grant |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g44g2000cwa .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "logjam" <g...@cmosxray.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics Subject: Re: Wall of RAM Date: 1 Jan 2006 19:42:51 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 6 Message-ID: <1136173371.832018.44540@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups. com> References: <1136172350.049224.231720@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.178.21.108 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1136173377 1998 127.0.0.1 (2 Jan 2006 03:42:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 03:42:57 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1136172350.049224.231720@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.178.21.108; posting-account=aBFcgg0AAAB82nqHKVyZXRJDEB6Qpe25 Well, in the excitement I forgot that 4,096 bytes is 32,768 bits. A little out of my range. So maybe we settle on 1k of ram. I don't think I have 32,000 leds of wall space to spare!!! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g43g2000cwa .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "logjam" <g...@cmosxray.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics Subject: Re: Wall of RAM Date: 1 Jan 2006 21:28:13 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 7 Message-ID: <1136179693.825070.183100@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com> References: <1136172350.049224.231720@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com> <1136173371.832018.44540@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups. com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.178.21.108 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1136179699 10313 127.0.0.1 (2 Jan 2006 05:28:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 05:28:19 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1136173371.832018.44540@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups. com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.178.21.108; posting-account=aBFcgg0AAAB82nqHKVyZXRJDEB6Qpe25 On second thought, a 1k ram wall would be 121x121" square. I just got done drafting it. I think maybe I should consider one 256 byte array and see how it goes. What considerations will I have to make for wire length? Possibly use a differential transciever set? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.c om!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com !local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.clear.net.nz!n ews.clear.net.nz.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 05:13:05 -0600 Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics From: Jasen Betts <j...@free.net.nospam.nz> Subject: Re: Wall of RAM References: <1136172350.049224.231720@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com> <1136173371.832018.44540@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups. com> <1136179693.825070.183100@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com> User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Debian) Message-ID: <5c60.43b8f53a.d0b55@clunker.homenet> Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 09:41:14 -0000 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: news.compass.net.nz X-Original-Trace: 3 Jan 2006 00:13:03 +1300, news.compass.net.nz Organization: CLEAR Net New Zealand http://www.clear.net.nz - Complaints a...@clear.net.nz Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.97.37.6 X-Trace: sv3-LgqVoVTcTj8UqWgK0eBwxFvRtEkJYs5+wyBDKAS5RIHYUe5Qa7 xNLzDGzk3qN+7ANzNe8ehXt9DPT1f!xaVH4M9L85F3IWqYbYkl 66Wfz0XKFqYBpPs2D9A7Fmd8ROewjufu0WZcomCrgU5cnQDzZA pKsQ== X-Complaints-To: Complaints to abuse@clear.net.nz X-DMCA-Complaints-To: Complaints to a...@clear.net.nz X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 On 2006-01-02, logjam <g...@cmosxray.com> wrote: > On second thought, a 1k ram wall would be 121x121" square. I just got > done drafting it. I think maybe I should consider one 256 byte array > and see how it goes. when you said 4K I thought you meant bits. and that it sounded possible but lots of work. > What considerations will I have to make for wire length? Possibly use > a differential transciever set? reduce the clock speed until it starts working? Bye. Jasen |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "logjam" <g...@cmosxray.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics Subject: Re: Wall of RAM Date: 2 Jan 2006 03:59:53 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 5 Message-ID: <1136203193.354765.163350@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com> References: <1136172350.049224.231720@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com> <1136173371.832018.44540@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups. com> <1136179693.825070.183100@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com> <5c60.43b8f53a.d0b55@clunker.homenet> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.178.21.108 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1136203198 8810 127.0.0.1 (2 Jan 2006 11:59:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 11:59:58 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <5c60.43b8f53a.d0b55@clunker.homenet> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.178.21.108; posting-account=aBFcgg0AAAB82nqHKVyZXRJDEB6Qpe25 All right, I'm not crazy any more. If I even try this I'll just use some dual port sram and fake it. That should be easier and allow a switch to choose which 1k bank of the memory to look at. A little more flexible. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news4.google.c om!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca. giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!atl-c08.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pc02.us enetserver.com!FUSE.NET-a2kHrUvQQWlmc!not-for-mail
From: "Bart" <bborb@fusedotnet> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics References: <1136172350.049224.231720@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com> <1136173371.832018.44540@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups. com> <1136179693.825070.183100@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com> <5c60.43b8f53a.d0b55@clunker.homenet> <1136203193.354765.163350@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com> Subject: Re: Wall of RAM Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 15:58:57 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Message-ID: <a3259$43b99411$d844260c$5737@FUSE.NET> X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com Organization: UseNetServer.com Lines: 15 X-Trace: a325943b994117de183a905737 "logjam" <g...@cmosxray.com> wrote in message news:1136203193.354765.163350@o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com... > All right, I'm not crazy any more. If I even try this I'll just use > some dual port sram and fake it. That should be easier and allow a > switch to choose which 1k bank of the memory to look at. A little more > flexible. > How many lights/led's would that be? Calculating your original thoughts showed scary amperage and blinding candle-power. I could be wrong, just a thought. Bart |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g14g2000cwa .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "logjam" <g...@cmosxray.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics Subject: Re: Wall of RAM Date: 2 Jan 2006 14:13:04 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 11 Message-ID: <1136239984.338696.151020@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups .com> References: <1136172350.049224.231720@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com> <1136173371.832018.44540@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups. com> <1136179693.825070.183100@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com> <5c60.43b8f53a.d0b55@clunker.homenet> <1136203193.354765.163350@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com> <a3259$43b99411$d844260c$5737@FUSE.NET> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.178.21.108 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1136239989 27317 127.0.0.1 (2 Jan 2006 22:13:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:13:09 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <a3259$43b99411$d844260c$5737@FUSE.NET> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.178.21.108; posting-account=aBFcgg0AAAB82nqHKVyZXRJDEB6Qpe25 I don't know. These aren't very bright LEDs. Here is what 1kbyte would look like: http://media.diywelder.com/images4/060102-1kvisual.jpg and a 1 to 1 scale: http://media.diywelder.com/images4/0...visual1to1.jpg You may think its crazy...but what am I supposed to do with my 50,000 LEDs??? |
|
|