Thread: The RamWall...
View Single Post
  #35  
Old 05-10-2007, 01:34 AM
Grant Stockly Grant Stockly is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 447
Default

Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!f14g2000cwb .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "logjam" <g...@cmosxray.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Wall of RAM
Date: 26 Jan 2006 02:17:54 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <1138270674.596111.204620@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>
References: <1136172350.049224.231720@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com>
<1136173371.832018.44540@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups. com>
<1136179693.825070.183100@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>
<5c60.43b8f53a.d0b55@clunker.homenet>
<1136203193.354765.163350@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com>
<a3259$43b99411$d844260c$5737@FUSE.NET>
<1136239984.338696.151020@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>
<1136449750.355847.145030@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>
<1138099185.523514.24280@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups. com>
<1138153524.809655.234750@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups .com>
<1138263782.914693.122420@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.178.21.108
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1138270679 30051 127.0.0.1 (26 Jan 2006 10:17:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:17:59 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1138263782.914693.122420@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.178.21.108;
posting-account=aBFcgg0AAAB82nqHKVyZXRJDEB6Qpe25

The Hako desoldering iron works great. Took me about 35-40 minutes to
desolder 300LEDs. Why can't they go in that fast? : ( The whole kit
with extra tips cost me about $280. I never would have bought it
without a strong recomendation from a friend. It works much better
than I thought it would.
Reply With Quote